Quote:
Originally Posted by robbym
Rogers has some definate advantages over Bell and Telus in Canada, however they also have some seriously lacking business practices. I for one don't like feeling ripped off or mistreated. I'd probably switch if ole Ted could start treating his customers like human beings instead of wallets with feet. This is one of the few areas where I envy the American side of my family, so much choice and the benefits of competition.
Note: One other advantage for Canadian CDMA users in populated centers is EV-DO for Blackberry which Robbers Wireless does not have an equivalent.
|
I agree.. i'm with you.. i'm not a Rogers fan..but no tcp/ip? no international roaming? what's the point? Rogers bought the market when they bought fido. There is *almost* no competition for any company that has users that travel internationally. For anyone that needs or wants tcp/ip in Canada, again, no competition.
So, my hand is forced. I think many others are too. Until Bell (or Telus) can release tcp/ip for their devices, half my hands are tied to that, and the other half are simply in the view that Rogers has a near monopoly (GSM)
Oh also, Rogers gets new devices first. Bell's a full year behind.. telus..??? hunh? right.. telus who?
Choose accordingly... if you don't travel internationally, send the odd e-mail here and there, and don't care about installing any apps on your BB, then go with telus or bell. But you are otherwise forced with no choice to go with Rogers (Robbers) wireless otherwise.
People with a personal vendetta against Rogers (this is many people) are forced to lower their standards. Poor people.