BlackBerry Forums Support Community
              

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-02-2006, 01:00 PM   #1
kitmoni
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
kitmoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Model: 8130
PIN: >Options>Status
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 296
Default Is it Cingular, or the 8700?

Please Login to Remove!

I'm a former 7250 user (Sprint) who switched to Cingular so I could use the 8700. I'm BES connected, but also use BIS for about 3 accounts. I like the 8700 from a speed and screen standpoint, but I am one of those that feels it's a little fragile.

The Problem: The biggest thing I'm struggling with is there seems to be a significant drop in voice quality after the switch. Everyone I talk with has noticed the change. Comparitively, the Cingular calls are much more "noisy" (static, garble from time to time, etc.). I am NOT a Sprint homer, I could care less which service I use as long as it's good. Also, I have trouble with dropped calls (funny, considering their recent add campaign) and placing calls. My usage is VERY heavy on the email side, and light on the browsing side. However, I use about 2400 minutes a month for voice, so I'm very concerned about the quality change.

Is this something that is unique to Cingular? I don't seem to notice the problems on my wife's Razor (switched her too), just on my 8700. If it's an 8700 issue, I'll solve that and move back to a 7290 so I don't have to switch carriers. But if it's a Cingular (or just a GSM) problem, I'll need your input! Are there other GSM carriers with better voice quality (like TMO), or do I need to switch back to CDMA? I would love to stay with the 8700, but I'm willing to bump back to the 72xx if I have to.

What do you think?? My conscience could really use some relief.

[edit] -- I've also changed my signature 3 times and it still comes up with my old PIN. ??
__________________
Kitmoni
Verizon 8703e
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:04 PM   #2
MikesTechSvcs
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toney, AL, USA
Model: 8700c
Posts: 28
Default

That's funny.
Back when I had my Razr, I used to get outstanding voice clarity.
But then I pick up a BlackBerry and everything sounds a little different.
The noise/crackles/garbles come with the territory. The 8700 is Quad Band isn't it? That might be why. I know Cingular operates on 1900 Mhz, which is the highest around so it could very well pick up power fluctuations and such stuff.

- Mike
__________________
Cingular :: BlackBerry 8700c
PIN: 2038CBE6
(256) 541-4311
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:14 PM   #3
careyana
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
careyana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Model: 8820
Carrier: CingATT
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitmoni
I'm a former 7250 user (Sprint) who switched to Cingular so I could use the 8700. I'm BES connected, but also use BIS for about 3 accounts. I like the 8700 from a speed and screen standpoint, but I am one of those that feels it's a little fragile.

The Problem: The biggest thing I'm struggling with is there seems to be a significant drop in voice quality after the switch. Everyone I talk with has noticed the change. Comparitively, the Cingular calls are much more "noisy" (static, garble from time to time, etc.). I am NOT a Sprint homer, I could care less which service I use as long as it's good. Also, I have trouble with dropped calls (funny, considering their recent add campaign) and placing calls. My usage is VERY heavy on the email side, and light on the browsing side. However, I use about 2400 minutes a month for voice, so I'm very concerned about the quality change.

Is this something that is unique to Cingular? I don't seem to notice the problems on my wife's Razor (switched her too), just on my 8700. If it's an 8700 issue, I'll solve that and move back to a 7290 so I don't have to switch carriers. But if it's a Cingular (or just a GSM) problem, I'll need your input! Are there other GSM carriers with better voice quality (like TMO), or do I need to switch back to CDMA? I would love to stay with the 8700, but I'm willing to bump back to the 72xx if I have to.

What do you think?? My conscience could really use some relief.

[edit] -- I've also changed my signature 3 times and it still comes up with my old PIN. ??
I've had my 8700 for a few months now and I haven't had any issues with voice quality. Did you pull your SIM from your old device? Is it an old AT&T SIM? I have seen issues with devices not functioning correctly so you may have just gotten a bad one. :(
__________________
BBs through my history: 957(8MB), 7280, 7290, 8700c
BB Now: 8820
_______________________
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:44 PM   #4
kitmoni
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
kitmoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Model: 8130
PIN: >Options>Status
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 296
Default

Wirelessly posted (Thumpers 8700c: BlackBerry8700/4.1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102)

Thanks for the input. Interesting to see someone else with the same Razr/BB difference. Might be the quad band issue. I've also noticed buzzing in my computer speakers when I get a new email (with BB on my desk), so that matches up. I have an employee with a 71xx BB who has the same sound quality issue. In some cases I don't think they even notice it because that's all they have known.

My Sim was new Cingular with my phone, but was originally assigned to a Nokia phone by mistake. That wouldn't make a difference would it?
__________________
Kitmoni
Verizon 8703e
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:51 PM   #5
EAndresen
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
EAndresen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Model: 8700c
Carrier: ATT
Posts: 98
Default

I had a razr and went to the BB and had opposite results... I think the BB is so much better quality, speaking on what I hear on my end. I have cingular. Also the Razr is a quadband phone as well so.... Just adding my thoughts.

BB 4 life.

E
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 01:54 PM   #6
ceebz
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
ceebz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Model: 8800
PIN: 23F2E165
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 212
Default

It's Cingular. Damned AMR-HR!!!!!
__________________

Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 02:11 PM   #7
kitmoni
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
kitmoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Model: 8130
PIN: >Options>Status
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EAndresen
I had a razr and went to the BB and had opposite results... I think the BB is so much better quality, speaking on what I hear on my end. I have cingular. Also the Razr is a quadband phone as well so.... Just adding my thoughts.

BB 4 life.

E
I suppose I should clarify. To ME, everything sounds the same. No problems. On the other end, however, is where I'm getting the complaints.
__________________
Kitmoni
Verizon 8703e
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 02:38 PM   #8
sigmamason
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
sigmamason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta
Model: 9800
OS: 6.0.0.141
PIN: 22BFEE32
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitmoni
Wirelessly posted (Thumpers 8700c: BlackBerry8700/4.1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102)

Thanks for the input. Interesting to see someone else with the same Razr/BB difference. Might be the quad band issue. I've also noticed buzzing in my computer speakers when I get a new email (with BB on my desk), so that matches up. I have an employee with a 71xx BB who has the same sound quality issue. In some cases I don't think they even notice it because that's all they have known.

My Sim was new Cingular with my phone, but was originally assigned to a Nokia phone by mistake. That wouldn't make a difference would it?

If I remember the network integration states correctly, Florida is one of the states that is going thru the Tower upgrade (switch from ATT to Cingular and upgrade non EDGE to EDGE/UMTS or HSPDA)
There is call quality degradation while this is happening...once complete, you should have clearer calls and improved voice/data signal strength.
Cingular has spent a ton of money working on moving the TDMA towers to GSM/HSPDA, integrating the old ATT networks into the Cingular networks, attempting to upgrade training to their CSRs (who in spite of the rumor are actually pretty nice and intelligent) upgrading existing towers to the latest/greatest GSM tech, etc...
__________________
We Walk By Faith, Not By Sight!!!
G.O.M.A.B.
218F694B
Travel Light!!!

Last edited by sigmamason; 06-04-2006 at 10:08 AM..
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 04:01 PM   #9
whoscalling
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
whoscalling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA (SoCal)
Model: 9550
OS: .517
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 427
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitmoni
The Problem: The biggest thing I'm struggling with is there seems to be a significant drop in voice quality after the switch. Everyone I talk with has noticed the change. Comparitively, the Cingular calls are much more "noisy" (static, garble from time to time, etc.). I am NOT a Sprint homer, I could care less which service I use as long as it's good. Also, I have trouble with dropped calls (funny, considering their recent add campaign) and placing calls. My usage is VERY heavy on the email side, and light on the browsing side. However, I use about 2400 minutes a month for voice, so I'm very concerned about the quality change.

Is this something that is unique to Cingular? I don't seem to notice the problems on my wife's Razor (switched her too), just on my 8700. If it's an 8700 issue, I'll solve that and move back to a 7290 so I don't have to switch carriers. But if it's a Cingular (or just a GSM) problem, I'll need your input! Are there other GSM carriers with better voice quality (like TMO), or do I need to switch back to CDMA? I would love to stay with the 8700, but I'm willing to bump back to the 72xx if I have to.
I have had the exact same experience. The only differences are I came to Cingular from Verizon Wireless and our locations. Other then that i could not agree with you more about the call quality and dropped calls. I too have wondered which of the two new variables (Cingular or 8700c) have caused this?
__________________
_____________________________________________
7100t, 7130e, 8700c, 8703e, 8830, Storm, Curve, Tour, Bold, Flip, Storm 2
www.evadearmor.com
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 08:21 PM   #10
Dubdub
Appleinator
 
Dubdub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Model: App6+
OS: AJBR549
PIN: Ask
Carrier: ATT & Verizon
Posts: 20,038
Default

Perhaps it is a coverage problem. How strong is the Cingular signal. I know with my 8700, when I go into areas with weaker coverage (2 bars or less) I have had connection and voice quality problems.
Offline  
Old 06-02-2006, 10:11 PM   #11
AlbertoM
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern Arizona
Model: 8830
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 495
Default

The speaker thing is common for GSM. Don't know about the rest...
__________________
Alberto
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 01:08 AM   #12
sivartyad
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Model: 8700
Posts: 3
Default Cingular Fails

It's Cingular. After 6 months of Verizon 7250, I just switched to the Cingular 8700 (mostly for international usage reasons). Within minutes of using the phone I noticed that the audio on calls was terrible - not only on my end but also for the person that I was calling.

Additionally, in the course of five days I've only been able to make less than half of the calls I would usually make on the Verizon 7250. Constantly showing as "No Service" and very often I dial and wait over 60 seconds for the call to connect. On every call I've made the quality of the call has been so poor that I've had to hang up and dial from a landline or the call has been completely dropped.

If you look closely, you'll see that Cingular's new ad campaign about the fewest dropped calls is in reference to the metro New York area only. While I live in Boston, what most would assume to be a well covered area in the way of cell phone use, it certainly doesn't apply with the 8700 from Cingular.

Lastly - tonight I performed a test. A friend has the 8700 from T-Mobile. I called myself from his 8700 and then called him from my 8700. The results:

When I called his T-Mobile phone from my Cingular phone, my call was terribly staticy and garbled. The same background noise was heard when listening through his phone.

When I called my Cingular phone from his T-Mobile phone, the call was crystal clear on his end, but was received on my Cingular phone again as terribly garbled and echoy.

Perhaps I'll just go back to the rotary dial phone. I'm so tired of all these cell phone companies.
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 09:58 AM   #13
r0guenj
Knows Where the Search Button Is
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Model: 9530
PIN: 305505FA
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 43
Default

Wirelessly posted (8700c: BlackBerry8700/4.1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102)

Voice quality is not the same as it was for me. I went from a razr to the 8700 and I notice a difference (I didn't seem edit the razr either)

I get consistent audio drop out even with full coverage and off peak hours.

I am thinking of carrying a separate phone because of this issue.
__________________
305505FA
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 01:09 PM   #14
kitmoni
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
kitmoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Model: 8130
PIN: >Options>Status
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 296
Default

So what I'm hearing is that several posting to this thread have gone from CDMA to GSM and have noticed a difference. Other than small coverage differences in certain areas, Sprint and Verizon operate the same type of network, CDMA.

Liking the 8700, I'm wondering if a jump to Tmobile would solve my voice problem, with the caveat being TMO is also GSM. I'm not sure what to think of the tower upgrade post in that Cingular already had a strong network presence in FL. I bought my 8700 from what would be considered as "Orange", or the Cingular network, not ATT. So I'm not sure I buy that the tower upgrade is affecting me - although I could be wrong.

I get my rebate on my phones this month, so maybe I'll do a little evaluation using another couple of services. Liking the 8700 overall, but if it improves my overall quality, I'd be willing to step back to a 7290 or 7250. Anyone on Cingular had this issue with 7290s??
__________________
Kitmoni
Verizon 8703e
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 01:12 PM   #15
BroomHilda
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Model: 8310
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 2
Default

I'm on T-Mobile and I upgraded from my Razr to the 8700g. I got the 8700g two days ago and I immediately noticed the voice quality of was significantly worse than the razr. My wife even commented on it without my saying anything (and she usually doesn't notice these things).

If it werenxxx8217;t for the voice quality I'd be ecstatic about my purchase.

I wish there were some way to check and switch between the Half Rate AMR voice codec and the enhance Full Rate codec. If anyone comes across a way to do this please let us know.

Thanks, -BHilda-
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 01:15 PM   #16
kitmoni
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
kitmoni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Model: 8130
PIN: >Options>Status
Carrier: Sprint
Posts: 296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroomHilda
I wish there were some way to check and switch between the Half Rate AMR voice codec and the enhance Full Rate codec. If anyone comes across a way to do this please let us know.
Hilda,

Can you explain this to me. I'm not familiar with HR AMR and Full Rate.
__________________
Kitmoni
Verizon 8703e
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 01:26 PM   #17
BroomHilda
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Model: 8310
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 2
Default

Actually I'm no expert on the voice codecs used by the cell industry. What little i know is this:

The voice data is compressed when it is sent over the cell network on digital systems. The codec and compression rate used can significanlty affect voice quality.

On other phones I have used there have been "hacks" to enable Full Rate encoding instead of the Half Rate encoding which is typically selected as a default.

From what I can tell there is also AMR (adaptive multi rate) which seems to be a newer form of codec which is adaptive... it varies it's data rate based on current conditions.

The 8700g seems to support AMR, but I don't know which codec is selected by default... or if there is even a choice.

If someone knows more than I do, please comment.

Thanks, -BHilda-
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 02:13 PM   #18
nosidam
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
 
nosidam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New York, NY, USA, Earth
Model: 9630
OS: 5.0.0.548
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 209
Default

I too went from a RAZR to the 8700c. The only difference that I've noticed is that the speaker in the 8700c starts to loose sound quality as it gets louder. I normally keep it between 50-75%, but when walking down the streets of midtown Manhattan during a weekday, it sometimes needs to go louder.

Sometimes the people on the other end say that there is too much background noise to hear me. I attribute this to the fact that a candybar phone has a more sensative mic than a flip-phone simply because it is further away from the mouth. I have had that exact same kind of report when I used other candybar style phones.

I'm using Bharti, but not sure if the stock or telstra voice quality is better/worse.
__________________
Illegitimus non carborundum
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 03:12 PM   #19
rjhouck
Thumbs Must Hurt
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Model: 7130c
Carrier: Cingular
Posts: 54
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kitmoni
I'm a former 7250 user (Sprint) who switched to Cingular so I could use the 8700. I'm BES connected, but also use BIS for about 3 accounts. I like the 8700 from a speed and screen standpoint, but I am one of those that feels it's a little fragile.

The Problem: The biggest thing I'm struggling with is there seems to be a significant drop in voice quality after the switch. Everyone I talk with has noticed the change. Comparitively, the Cingular calls are much more "noisy" (static, garble from time to time, etc.). I am NOT a Sprint homer, I could care less which service I use as long as it's good. Also, I have trouble with dropped calls (funny, considering their recent add campaign) and placing calls. My usage is VERY heavy on the email side, and light on the browsing side. However, I use about 2400 minutes a month for voice, so I'm very concerned about the quality change.

Is this something that is unique to Cingular? I don't seem to notice the problems on my wife's Razor (switched her too), just on my 8700. If it's an 8700 issue, I'll solve that and move back to a 7290 so I don't have to switch carriers. But if it's a Cingular (or just a GSM) problem, I'll need your input! Are there other GSM carriers with better voice quality (like TMO), or do I need to switch back to CDMA? I would love to stay with the 8700, but I'm willing to bump back to the 72xx if I have to.

What do you think?? My conscience could really use some relief.

[edit] -- I've also changed my signature 3 times and it still comes up with my old PIN. ??
I had the same issue going from the Razor to the BB8700c. The Razor had great audio quality on my ear and no one on the other end complained about my audio. However, when I went to the 8700c the audio on my ear was fine but everyone complained about background noice. I tested this on my office voicemail and it is true. The BB8700c does not cancel out the background noice. I have tried several different Bluetooth devises but there is still lots of background noice.

I think I am going to have to carry around my old razor as a phone and use the BB for email only. I hate to think about having to carry two devises.
__________________
Apple IPhone
Jawbone
Nokia BH-900
Offline  
Old 06-03-2006, 03:44 PM   #20
Dubdub
Appleinator
 
Dubdub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Hampshire
Model: App6+
OS: AJBR549
PIN: Ask
Carrier: ATT & Verizon
Posts: 20,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sivartyad
It's Cingular. After 6 months of Verizon 7250, I just switched to the Cingular 8700 (mostly for international usage reasons). Within minutes of using the phone I noticed that the audio on calls was terrible - not only on my end but also for the person that I was calling.

Additionally, in the course of five days I've only been able to make less than half of the calls I would usually make on the Verizon 7250. Constantly showing as "No Service" and very often I dial and wait over 60 seconds for the call to connect. On every call I've made the quality of the call has been so poor that I've had to hang up and dial from a landline or the call has been completely dropped.

If you look closely, you'll see that Cingular's new ad campaign about the fewest dropped calls is in reference to the metro New York area only. While I live in Boston, what most would assume to be a well covered area in the way of cell phone use, it certainly doesn't apply with the 8700 from Cingular.

Lastly - tonight I performed a test. A friend has the 8700 from T-Mobile. I called myself from his 8700 and then called him from my 8700. The results:

When I called his T-Mobile phone from my Cingular phone, my call was terribly staticy and garbled. The same background noise was heard when listening through his phone.

When I called my Cingular phone from his T-Mobile phone, the call was crystal clear on his end, but was received on my Cingular phone again as terribly garbled and echoy.

Perhaps I'll just go back to the rotary dial phone. I'm so tired of all these cell phone companies.
I am in Boston all the time and have no problem with Cingular. The only problem areas in New England that I have found over the last several years are on I-89 between Concord and Lebanon, north of Augusta, ME, and in a few areas inthe hills of CT. BTW, I have an 8700c.
Offline  
Closed Thread



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


US Stock 110VAC 60W 40KHz Ultrasonic Cleaning Transducer Cleaner & Driver Board picture

US Stock 110VAC 60W 40KHz Ultrasonic Cleaning Transducer Cleaner & Driver Board

$50.53



Emerson 809-3000 Semiconductor Refrigerant Transducer 12-24V AC picture

Emerson 809-3000 Semiconductor Refrigerant Transducer 12-24V AC

$225.00



CR Magnetic CR4180-20 True RMS AC Current Transducer 3 Element - New picture

CR Magnetic CR4180-20 True RMS AC Current Transducer 3 Element - New

$229.95



Interface Transducer MB-25-579 picture

Interface Transducer MB-25-579

$150.00



Micron 39-102-370-1821 Position Transducer Made in USA picture

Micron 39-102-370-1821 Position Transducer Made in USA

$299.94



MTS LPRHVU00701 Temposonics Transducer Linear Position LPR-HVU-00701 90014868 picture

MTS LPRHVU00701 Temposonics Transducer Linear Position LPR-HVU-00701 90014868

$238.95







Copyright © 2004-2016 BlackBerryForums.com.
The names RIM © and BlackBerry © are registered Trademarks of BlackBerry Inc.