Oh I just wish I could see the PM's and Mod board on fire right now... "Apple is at it again" "Should we ban Apple forever" "Freaking Apple"
Don't worry J I'm hoping that we can all be mature and civil and talk it out! lol
Only one thread. It's not that hard. You're not the first. Won't be the last.
If you answer my question I'll drop it. Thats all I've wanted from the get go. If it's good for the goose it's good for the gander. Or in this case if it's good for the *cough* Dawg *cough* it's good for the Pup (If we're basing rank on posts/time on the boards)
EDIT your right I remember my rant thread sorry... My brains been on vacation as well as myself...
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBlackBerry
Only one thread. It's not that hard. You're not the first. Won't be the last.
Let it go.
__________________
"I am always amazed at how these men walk into fires, when the rest of us run from them" - Rudolph Giuliani on Firemen
Last edited by apple85; 10-30-2007 at 03:26 PM..
Reason: whoops
Why someone can get away with pointing out quote "Stupidity" (it was directly pointed at the person) and not get in trouble... Yet when I call them on it and use a not so flattering term as an example of name calling I got in trouble. There is more tack-full words then saying someones "Stupidity"
__________________
"I am always amazed at how these men walk into fires, when the rest of us run from them" - Rudolph Giuliani on Firemen
You were given an infraction (which is nothing more than a warning) and you went off the deep end. The post did not cause the ban. It was the unnecessary overreaction. In fact, the ban was extended because others felt it was insufficient. That's pretty bad.
I contacted Dawg - who I felt did not deserve an infraction - and told him to back off, which he did.