Thread: 4.6.0.217
View Single Post
Old 12-29-2008, 09:09 PM   #32
blakjak
New Member
 
blakjak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Model: 9000
PIN: N/A
Carrier: Rogers
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SVF View Post
Could you offer examples of what seems more solid.
It seems .21x has been contradictory as user experiences go.
This last flurry of beta access is quite unusual to me. Certainly there will be incremental advances as an OS matures but at some point a Sweet build gets through even if it's not released by carriers. Currently .210 is as good as I've seen -
.210 is very good but .217 is better if you abstract small glitches that many of users don't particularly care for. Example: many improvements to the browser, including speed. It might have been compromised with radio reception in some areas, hence battery leakage or restarts. Again, it is very dependable on your carrier but overall, important improvements have been made. While 210 tested well, 217 outperformed it - sorry. However, whatever works for each individual go for it as it is subjective to many variables beside the carier.
Offline   Reply With Quote