|
|
04-07-2007, 05:31 AM
|
#1
|
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Model: 9000
Carrier: AT&T Wireless
Posts: 315
|
3G on 8300
Please Login to Remove!
I have had an 8700c and am very happy with it. I have not upgraded to the 8800 mainly because it does not have 3G. I feel the same way about the 8300. To me, wifi, even if the 8300 has it, is not of that much utility. I want faster data speeds (for the BB or tethering to my laptop) when Wifi is not available.
Is there any possibility of a BB with 3G anytime soon.
Knocka
|
Offline
|
|
04-07-2007, 06:48 AM
|
#2
|
Knows Where the Search Button Is
Join Date: Feb 2007
Model: 8800
Carrier: Cingular
Posts: 35
|
3g
My understanding is it supports Edge.
3G will not come until the 9XXX series of BB's come out late this year that also support HPSDA. HPSDA is the one we all really need so we can do voice and data at the same time.
|
Offline
|
|
04-07-2007, 07:57 AM
|
#3
|
Grumpy Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Somewhere in the swamps of Jersey
Model: SGS7
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 27,948
|
Or even HSPDA....
Rumors, rumors everywhere....
|
Offline
|
|
04-07-2007, 09:03 PM
|
#4
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Model: none
Carrier: Verizon
Posts: 125
|
Get in line. There are lots of things that we all want. That will be in the coming years. Only RIM/Blackberry knows.
|
Offline
|
|
04-09-2007, 11:53 AM
|
#5
|
BlackBerry Mensa
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 7,741
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knocka
Is there any possibility of a BB with 3G anytime soon.
|
If by "soon" you mean the next few years, yes.
If, however, you mean the next few months, no.
Considering that all we have is speculation on the release ob the 83XX's it's a bit early to worry about any pending release of the 9XXX's.
|
Offline
|
|
04-09-2007, 04:03 PM
|
#6
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Dec 2004
Model: 8800c
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NJBlackBerry
Or even HSPDA....
Rumors, rumors everywhere....
|
and hopefully HSDPA too!
|
Offline
|
|
04-09-2007, 04:05 PM
|
#7
|
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
Model: 9000
Carrier: AT&T Wireless
Posts: 315
|
I thought 3G and HSPDA were the same. Shows what I know. Can someone explain the difference?
|
Offline
|
|
04-09-2007, 04:24 PM
|
#8
|
Talking BlackBerry Encyclopedia
Join Date: Nov 2006
Model: 8820
Carrier: AT&T
Posts: 326
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knocka
I thought 3G and HSPDA were the same. Shows what I know. Can someone explain the difference?
|
its HSDPA btw. saying they're the same is akin to saying 802.11g and broadband are the same. they aren't in the same category because HSDPA is a FORM of 3G that allows voice and data to be used at the same time so you can potentially download a file or song or whatever and be on a call at the same time. 3G is just a general term for cellular high speed. UMTS is a slower form of 3G that does not allow voice and data at the same time.
|
Offline
|
|
04-10-2007, 01:19 AM
|
#9
|
No longer Registered.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mesa Arizona
Model: 8800
PIN: 240582A8
Carrier: tmobile
Posts: 647
|
iwas readin reuters tonight apently $G is already in the works
but sprint seems to be the onloy carrier testing it out cures you sprint an the other cdma carriers
|
Offline
|
|
04-10-2007, 12:04 PM
|
#10
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Mar 2006
Model: 8800
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 171
|
Galvatron - are you typing very fast on your phone when you post? Sometimes I can understand what the heck you're trying to say!
__________________
BlackBerry 8800
T-MO BIS
T-MO 4.5.0.37
Desktop Manager 4.5
PIN 205CC25C
|
Offline
|
|
04-10-2007, 07:32 PM
|
#11
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outrigger
its HSDPA btw. saying they're the same is akin to saying 802.11g and broadband are the same. they aren't in the same category because HSDPA is a FORM of 3G that allows voice and data to be used at the same time so you can potentially download a file or song or whatever and be on a call at the same time. 3G is just a general term for cellular high speed. UMTS is a slower form of 3G that does not allow voice and data at the same time.
|
A brief history of mobile radio technologies:
"1G" - analog phones; switched access. AMPS.
"2G" - digital phones; switched access. TDMA, GSM, CDMA
"2.5G" - digital phones with packet data (switched voice). 1xRTT, GPRS
"2.75G" - faster data. EDGE, EV-DO
"3G" - simultaneous operation of switched voice and packet data. W-CDMA (UMTS), CDMA2000*
"3.5G" - faster data access. HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO RevA, EV-DO revB
"4G" - packet voice and data. SC-TDMA; IMS/VCC
|
Offline
|
|
04-11-2007, 12:35 AM
|
#12
|
CrackBerry Addict
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Model: Z10
Carrier: Lord Rogers - 107
Posts: 862
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungineer
A brief history of mobile radio technologies:
"1G" - analog phones; switched access. AMPS.
"2G" - digital phones; switched access. TDMA, GSM, CDMA
"2.5G" - digital phones with packet data (switched voice). 1xRTT, GPRS
"2.75G" - faster data. EDGE, EV-DO
"3G" - simultaneous operation of switched voice and packet data. W-CDMA (UMTS), CDMA2000*
"3.5G" - faster data access. HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO RevA, EV-DO revB
"4G" - packet voice and data. SC-TDMA; IMS/VCC
|
I thought CDMA2000, at least on THIS continent preceeded EV-DO, even for Verizon first to launch EV-DO. Oh well.
Can anyone extrapolate these technologies to Theoretical & Real-World Max data transfer rates?
GSM = 9.6-12.6kbps (up & down)
GPRS = 43.6/.8kbps Down (Thoeretical 53kbps)
EDGE = 180kbps Down/26kbps up (NON tethered/ 386kbps Down Theoretical) - this on MSC-9 algorhythm.
anything any body can correct or adjust?
__________________
Senior help desk administrator (rim_db_admin_sr_helpdesk)
Serious Mobile
|
Offline
|
|
04-11-2007, 06:55 PM
|
#13
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagga
I thought CDMA2000, at least on THIS continent preceeded EV-DO, even for Verizon first to launch EV-DO. Oh well.
|
Hence the asterisk. Qualcomm will tell you that all of CDMA is a "3G" network, but that really depends on how you define third-gen.
And yes CDMA2000 predates EV-DO, as well as (i believe) 1xRTT... my timeline doesn't really make as much sense unless you consider CDMA(/2000) to be 2G instead of 3G.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagga
Can anyone extrapolate these technologies to Theoretical & Real-World Max data transfer rates?
GSM = 9.6-12.6kbps (up & down)
GPRS = 43.6/.8kbps Down (Thoeretical 53kbps)
EDGE = 180kbps Down/26kbps up (NON tethered/ 386kbps Down Theoretical) - this on MSC-9 algorhythm.
anything any body can correct or adjust?
|
1xRTT was something like 144kbps theoretical,
HSDPA starts at 384kbps and goes upwards... different handsets will give you 720kbps or faster... I'm still not too sure whether this is based on higher modulation rates or multiple concurrent channels
EV-DO rev0 is in the same class as HSDPA, EV-DO revA promises to be faster. There are also updates to EDGE (GERAN) that are meant to increase the data rate of the TDMA based technology, but you won't likely see / hear about that for a few years yet.
When you get into stuff like WiMax and WiFi, then the data speeds really go through the roof. WiMax promises "broadband" speeds wirelessly, by which they mean 1-3Mbps.
All of this becomes fairly redundant if your actual mobile phone can't process the data fast enough... sure you may have peak throughput of 384 kbps, but your average is going to be something closer to half that if your baseband can't run fast enough to decode and "do" something with your data. Even worse is if your fancy apps core can't say, render an image you just downloaded at lightning fast speeds. It all becomes very academic except for those people who want to use their phones as modems for their laptops.
|
Offline
|
|
04-12-2007, 12:15 PM
|
#14
|
BlackBerry Extraordinaire
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: California, USA
Model: 8310
Carrier: at&t
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungineer
When you get into stuff like WiMax and WiFi, then the data speeds really go through the roof.
|
Yay.... like a rocket on the 4th of July...
To Fungineer,
All kidding aside, Thanks for your excellent posts.....
__________________
My All Time Favorite: _RED-8310_ Backups: 7130c, 8100, O2 8300, at&t 8300, 8700c, 8800, 8820
|
Offline
|
|
04-14-2007, 01:30 PM
|
#15
|
Knows Where the Search Button Is
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: ATL
Model: 8700C
Carrier: VZW and the New AT&T
Posts: 32
|
This quote is ridiculous. I have both Cingular HSDPA and Verizon EVDO, and you call EDGE 2.75 and equate it with EVDO? Rlmao!!! Edge is barely faster then 1xrtt. Evdo is just as fast as HSDPA on average. EVDO is definitely 3G, not 2.75. HSDPA will be faster when Cingular allows the faster speeds on their network, but even Cingular doesn't claim average speeds to be more than 400 to 700k, just like EVDO.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungineer
A brief history of mobile radio technologies:
"1G" - analog phones; switched access. AMPS.
"2G" - digital phones; switched access. TDMA, GSM, CDMA
"2.5G" - digital phones with packet data (switched voice). 1xRTT, GPRS
"2.75G" - faster data. EDGE, EV-DO
"3G" - simultaneous operation of switched voice and packet data. W-CDMA (UMTS), CDMA2000*
"3.5G" - faster data access. HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO RevA, EV-DO revB
"4G" - packet voice and data. SC-TDMA; IMS/VCC
|
__________________
I am not Neo, but I am still The One
|
Offline
|
|
04-14-2007, 03:41 PM
|
#16
|
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Model: 8700
Carrier: Vodafone
Posts: 5
|
We have some 8707V which have 3g built in modem
|
Offline
|
|
04-14-2007, 11:45 PM
|
#17
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: usa
Model: 8310
Carrier: ATT
Posts: 133
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jek
We have some 8707V which have 3g built in modem
|
They don't run on cing. 3g frequency.
I can't wait for a 3g blackberry for the great call quality. My 3g phones sound outstanding. Faster data will rock as well.
|
Offline
|
|
04-15-2007, 09:15 AM
|
#18
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Tx
Model: 9000
Carrier: ATT
Posts: 159
|
The best thing about a possible 3g blackberry would be the possibility of slingbox on it.
|
Offline
|
|
04-16-2007, 11:57 AM
|
#19
|
Thumbs Must Hurt
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Model: 8100
Carrier: T-Mobile
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by briankeith513
This quote is ridiculous. I have both Cingular HSDPA and Verizon EVDO, and you call EDGE 2.75 and equate it with EVDO? Rlmao!!! Edge is barely faster then 1xrtt. Evdo is just as fast as HSDPA on average. EVDO is definitely 3G, not 2.75. HSDPA will be faster when Cingular allows the faster speeds on their network, but even Cingular doesn't claim average speeds to be more than 400 to 700k, just like EVDO.
|
I was trying to equate that EVDO = 1xRTT++, similar to how EDGE = GPRS++.
But this isn't really the case. Sadly CDMA isn't really my strong point, so I am afraid I was mistaken before.
IS-95 (cdmaOne) is 2G, and 1xRTT is 2.5G
CDMA2000 1xEVDO is 3G, as recognized by IMT, and is much different than 1xRTT - didn't realize that until I did some reading on the weekend.
|
Offline
|
|
|
|