well, the benchmarking app i believe tests underneath the applications and only tests the hardware and OS/firmware much the way a benchmark for your download or upload speed would work...this is how it gets the operations per second number among other things
Quote:
Features:
- Heavy load on animation, DOM access and modification, spline and polygon rendering
- Mapping test
- User Interface simulation
- Font rendering
- Gaming
- Cartoon animation
- SVG load and parse test
- Low level performance tests
|
maybe your right, but i'd have to check into the JBenchmark software more...they also give an average from all users of different models for their benchmarking comparisons...it'd be nice to see if they could start including separate OS releases for those benchmarks to get a better idea since the OS version is more and more important day by day apparently
but in any case, an estimate from running the benchmarks would be fine...and especially if we both ran it on our own systems and compared our benchmarks with each upgrade to different OSes on each system...a before and after
secondly, all the applications can be closed just to single out that variable more...the only thing we don't know about are background processes...but really how many can it be? if it can be a lot, then this is more merit argument of my desire that the OS should include better control of those background processes
here are my numbers:
Model: 9530
OS-firmware: 4.7.0.75
Platform: 4.0.0.94
Cryptographic Kernel: 3.8.5.51
Branding Version: 1.0.105.179- Graphics:35.7 polygons per second
- CPU: 543560 operations per second
- Speed Index: 579.2
woohoo! over a half of a megaflop on my mobile phone...sweet!
