[00hoangc]

SO i just tried taking a photo using my storm. the image quality i would say isn't the best for a 3.2mp camera. Even the Sony Ericsson K800i did better IMO, but aside from that it is okay. coour reproduction isnt quite there yet, the red in the picture didn't turn out too good. edges got blurry, and the image is a bit noisy too.

Photo

Video recording i must say is much better than taking a photo. The quality isnt pixelated or blurry, even with rapid movements. Again colour isnt too great, but it is still decent for all them random videos we like to make

Video

bare in mind the video quality went down a bit going through youtube

[dwp1975]

Photo quailty is surprisingly good. Did you have to adjust the settings or was that photo taken with it in default settings.

[00hoangc]

Originally Posted by dwp1975

Photo quailty is surprisingly good. Did you have to adjust the settings or was that photo taken with it in default settings.

yeah it was all default settings. but default is 'superfine' quailty and max resolution.

[evilblade]

Here is something as well:

Camera resolution reduced to 3.2MP.

Kodak

Storm


I'm rubbish photographer so be gentle please.

Regards.

[leftcoaster]

No, that's great. Good enough to avoid buying a pocket digicam for emergency use. Thanks!!

[BigA]

Between the kodak and the storm, the storm has richer colors while the kodak is sharper more detailed. JMO..

[sleeper55]

Originally Posted by BigA

Between the kodak and the storm, the storm has richer colors while the kodak is sharper more detailed. JMO..

Agreed! i think it is funny how kodak's always make everything blue! the best is a kodak picture of blue snow, hahahahah

[Doctor Neutron]

Upon clicking camera button, I used BB key to switch to video camera and took a short video - when I attempt to save, says unsupported format or the like. Regular video camera icon works fine. Operator error or OS ?