BlackBerry Forums Support Community

BlackBerry Forums Support Community (http://www.blackberryforums.com/index.php)
-   Media Center (http://www.blackberryforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   Mount Rushmore Wallpaper - 81xx, 83xx, 87xx, 88xx, 90xx (http://www.blackberryforums.com/showthread.php?t=148307)

Zeeman28a 09-03-2008 02:27 PM

Mount Rushmore Wallpaper - 81xx, 83xx, 87xx, 88xx, 90xx
 
81xx - 240x260
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...ore240x260.jpg

http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...re240x260b.jpg

83xx, 87xx, 88xx - 320x240
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...ore320x240.jpg

90xx - 480x320
http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...ore480x320.jpg

http://i187.photobucket.com/albums/x...re480x320b.jpg

JSanders 09-03-2008 02:29 PM

the first and last just look severely squished and stretched... not cool.

Your other wallpapers you pasted today have looked nice. :)

Zeeman28a 09-03-2008 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSanders (Post 1085978)
the first and last just look severely squished and stretched... not cool.

Your other wallpapers you pasted today have looked nice. :)

Yeah I noticed. I'm working on better versions. Will repost later.

JSanders 09-03-2008 02:56 PM

The difference is that on this, the faces of Mt Rushmore, it is easy to see the squished and stretched distortion, because it is faces.

On your other wallpapers/images, I see they are done the same way either stretched or squished to fit the pixel size of the image needed. What you should be doing instead is creating or grabbing a base image and then either cropping to the pixel dimension you need (such as 320x240) as you need, rather than stretching them in your graphics program.

juwaack68 09-03-2008 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSanders (Post 1086014)
The difference is that on this, the faces of Mt Rushmore, it is easy to see the squished and stretched distortion, because it is faces.

On your other wallpapers/images, I see they are done the same way either stretched or squished to fit the pixel size of the image needed. What you should be doing instead is creating or grabbing a base image and then either cropping to the pixel dimension you need (such as 320x240) as you need, rather than stretching them in your graphics program.

I suppose you think you know a thing or 2 about images, huh? Sheesh. Know it all :razz:

Zeeman28a 09-03-2008 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSanders (Post 1086014)
The difference is that on this, the faces of Mt Rushmore, it is easy to see the squished and stretched distortion, because it is faces.

On your other wallpapers/images, I see they are done the same way either stretched or squished to fit the pixel size of the image needed. What you should be doing instead is creating or grabbing a base image and then either cropping to the pixel dimension you need (such as 320x240) as you need, rather than stretching them in your graphics program.

Yeah that's what I was doing. Trying out a shortcut. Didn't work out so good. I'll go back to doing it the long way or I'll go back to creating my own images at the proper res. Thanks for the input.

Getting images down to 240x260 to fit a pearl though is not easy. I was able to fix the Rushmore pics but I had to add a border. Not great for the 240x260 but ok for the 480x320. Just not sure of the color for the border. I have 2. Black and White.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.